 
        
        
      
           
        
        
      
           
        
        
      
           
        
        
      
           
        
        
      
           
        
        
      
           
        
        
      
           
        
        
      
    Our Concerns
- Pollution - Air: the plant will emit nearly 750 tons a year of pollutants, including Nitrogen Oxides (Ozone), Sulfur Dioxide, and Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPS) 
- Water: runoff from the plant will feed directly into Pigeon Creek 
- Ground: Naphtha and Hydrogen sulfide, volatile and lethal chemicals will be produced and stored on-site 
- Noise: 100 railcars a day carrying coal and innumerable large trucks carrying chemicals into and out of the plant 
- Dust: four 100 foot tall stacks of coal left open to the wind 
- Global warming: the fuel it produces releases twice as much carbon dioxide as conventional diesel and the plant will emit 2.2 million tons of CO2 yearly 
 
- Proximity to town - 1 mile from the local elementary school, nursing home, and town center 
- Increased risks of preterm birth, infant mortality, deficits in lung growth, respiratory symptoms, asthma exacerbations, and asthma hospitalizations in town residents and their children 
 
- Effects on tourism - Sulfur produced will have a strong odor 
- Increased trucks and trains will cause traffic through and around town 
- The plant itself will be an eyesore 
- Light from the flares will blaze into the night 
 
- Decreased property values - For properties around the plant and those who will have the water and wastewater pipes built on their properties 
 
- It will burden our resources - 1.8 million gallons of water a day 
- Large amounts of electricity or natural gas to run the plant 
 
- This technology is highly controversial - No plant of its kind has ever been built in the US 
- All other similar plants have either been stopped before breaking ground or have been stopped mid-construction, leaving investors in debt and a mess for the local community to clean up 
 
- It is not economically sound - Due to the expense in making this fuel, it is not profitable unless oil prices are over $100 a barrel. Today, the price of oil is around $60 a barrel 
 
- Poor reputation - KBR has had several lawsuits for dishonest practices. Notably, they knowingly exposed Tell City National Guard soldiers to harmful levels of chromium, resulting in the deaths of two American heroes 
- Riverview Energy attempted to build a similar facility in Vermillion County, but after 4 years the local authority backed out 
 
- It is not feasible in the long-term - Laws regulating carbon may make these fuels economically nonviable, resulting in plant closure, unemployment, and a toxic waste site 
 
Sources
- https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/02/clean-coal-america-kemper-power-plant 
- https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-ctl/china-builds-plant-to-turn-coal-into-barrels-of-oil-idUSSP13361320080604 
- http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/114/6/1699 
- https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/feb/20/china.ctl 
- https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060013819 
- https://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-isenberg/kbr-private-military-canc_b_609247.html?ncid=engmodushpmg00000006 

